How 1DevTool compares
Side-by-side breakdowns of 1DevTool against AI IDEs, coding agents, and terminal tools — updated for v1.73 with Charts, 18 CLI agents, Conversation Mode, and a 23-engine local toolchain. Pricing, model choice, and what each product is actually built for.
At a glance
Six decisive capabilities across 1DevTool and the tools people ask about most. Full tables live on each comparison page.
| Capability | 1DevTool | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | Windsurf | Trae | tmux | Ghostty |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | From $29 one-time | $20/month | $19/month | Free / $15+/month | Free tier + $3–$100/mo | Free (open source) | Free (open source) |
| AI CLI agents supported | 18 (Claude, Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Cline, Amp, OpenCode, Qwen, Grok, Kimi, Antigravity, Hermes, Pi, Aider, Devin, Kiro, Oh My Pi, Qoder) | Cursor agent | Copilot agent | Cascade | Trae SOLO | n/a | n/a |
| Run agents in parallel | Charts, teams & pipelines | No | No | No | Single SOLO loop | n/a | n/a |
| Bring your own AI subscription | Yes | Cursor-hosted | GitHub-hosted | Windsurf-hosted | Token-metered | n/a | n/a |
| Built-in DB + HTTP + browser | 23 engines + HTTP + profiles | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Session persistence | Tmux-backed | No | No | No | Basic | Yes (core feature) | No |
1DevTool vs alternatives
Full feature tables, short answers, and FAQs for each tool — priced, orchestrated, and toolchained against current 1DevTool.
1DevTool vs Cursor
Which AI coding tool is right for you?
Read comparison
1DevTool vs GitHub Copilot
Multi-agent workspace vs inline completions
Read comparison
1DevTool vs Windsurf
Multi-agent freedom vs integrated AI IDE
Read comparison
1DevTool vs VS Code + Copilot
Dedicated AI workspace vs AI-enhanced editor
Read comparison
1DevTool vs Trae
Bring-your-own-key multi-agent workspace vs ByteDance's AI IDE
Read comparison
1DevTool vs Superset
Two parallel multi-agent coding workspaces — integrated dev toolchain vs open-source worktree orchestration
Read comparison
1DevTool vs tmux
Visual multi-agent workspace vs keyboard-driven multiplexer
Read comparison
1DevTool vs Ghostty
Full AI workspace vs fast terminal emulator
Read comparison
1DevTool vs Herdr
Visual multi-agent workspace vs terminal agent multiplexer
Read comparison
1DevTool vs Synara
Integrated dev toolchain vs free open-source agent workspace
Read comparison
1DevTool vs Paseo
Integrated dev toolchain vs cross-platform agent orchestrator
Read comparison
1DevTool vs Orca
Integrated dev toolchain vs open-source agent development environment
Read comparisonTool vs tool head-to-heads
Neutral comparisons between other products — no 1DevTool in the table. 114 of them, grouped by what you are actually choosing between.
Open-weight passes & cheap model subscriptions
ClinePass, OpenCode Go, GLM, Qwen, MiniMax, Kimi, DeepSeek and the routers — the $6-to-$30 tier, where the meter matters more than the model.
ClinePass vs Chutes
One flat pass tied to one agent, or serverless open-model inference you can pay for with almost anything — including TAO.
Read comparisonClinePass vs DeepSeek API
ClinePass resells DeepSeek V4 inside a flat pass. Going direct is cheaper per token — if you can get money into the account.
Read comparisonClinePass vs DevPass
Both are flat-rate passes. One buys you open weights for $9.99; the other buys you Claude and GPT at three times face value.
Read comparisonClinePass vs GLM Coding Plan
One $9.99 pass across six labs, or Z.ai's own GLM-5.3 plan with quotas you can actually count.
Read comparisonClinePass vs Kimi Code
Both get you Kimi K3. One costs $9.99 and bundles five other labs; the other is Moonshot's own membership — if you can get a seat.
Read comparisonClinePass vs MiniMax Coding Plan
A cheap multi-lab pass against MiniMax's own plan — where M3's million-token context and a shared multimodal quota are the draw.
Read comparisonClinePass vs OpenCode Go
Two flat-rate subscriptions for open-weight coding models, a penny apart. One publishes its caps in dollars; the other does not publish them at all.
Read comparisonClinePass vs OpenCode Zen
A flat $9.99 pass for open weights versus a prepaid gateway that also carries Claude, GPT-5.6 and Gemini.
Read comparisonClinePass vs OpenRouter
A flat pass across six labs, or a credit balance that reaches every lab there is — including the frontier ones.
Read comparisonClinePass vs Qwen Coding Plan
Cline's flat pass against Alibaba's credit plan — and the unusual 7-day window that changes how you pace work.
Read comparisonClinePass vs Synthetic
$9.99 with a quota nobody can see, or $30 with the clearest request cap in the category — and a concurrency limit to match.
Read comparisonGLM Coding Plan vs DeepSeek API
A subscription with a quota window against raw tokens with no window at all — and two very different experiences at the payment page.
Read comparisonGLM Coding Plan vs Kimi Code
Two lab-direct memberships at almost the same entry price — but only one of them is currently taking new subscribers without a queue.
Read comparisonGLM Coding Plan vs MiniMax Coding Plan
A text-only coding plan with published credit quotas against a multimodal quota built around a million-token model.
Read comparisonGLM Coding Plan vs Qwen Coding Plan
The two biggest lab-direct coding subscriptions, and they meter you on completely different clocks.
Read comparisonLongCat plan vs GLM Coding Plan
LongCat has no subscription at all — just very cheap tokens and flash-sale packs. GLM has quotas you can plan a month around.
Read comparisonMiniMax Coding Plan vs Kimi Code
Both sell a million-token model at around $20. One gives you that context on every tier; the other gates it behind the top one.
Read comparisonOpenCode Go vs GLM Coding Plan
Both publish their limits — one in dollars, one in credits. That single difference decides which is cheaper for you.
Read comparisonOpenCode Go vs MiniMax Coding Plan
OpenCode Go already includes MiniMax M3. The question is whether you want it alongside 23 other models or with MiniMax's full allowance behind it.
Read comparisonOpenCode Go vs OpenCode Zen
Same company, same API key, opposite billing. Go caps you at $60/month of usage; Zen just spends your balance.
Read comparisonOpenCode Go vs OpenRouter
Six times your money in usage but only on 24 models, or list price on everything with a 5.5% fee on the way in.
Read comparisonOpenCode Go vs Qwen Coding Plan
A 5-hour dollar cap against a 7-day credit window — the same monthly budget behaves completely differently.
Read comparisonOpenRouter vs Nano-GPT
Two routers, same idea, different tax: OpenRouter charges 5.5% on the way in, Nano-GPT charges nothing on deposit but sells a subscription instead.
Read comparisonOpenRouter vs OpenCode Zen
Everything ever released, or a short list somebody actually tested for coding. Both are pay-per-token; the curation is the product.
Read comparisonQwen Coding Plan vs Kimi Code
One is three times cheaper and multimodal; the other is the lab that makes K3 — if it will sell you a seat.
Read comparisonQwen Coding Plan vs MiniMax Coding Plan
The two multimodal coding subscriptions — both bundle image and speech, both publish concurrency, and they meter on very different clocks.
Read comparisonXiaomi MiMo plan vs GLM Coding Plan
The cheapest official lab pass in this market against the most widely supported one — and the strictest ceiling policy you'll find.
Read comparisonFrontier plans
Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Copilot, Antigravity, Devin, Kiro, Factory, Amp and Warp — what each seat costs, and what happens when you hit the cap.
Amp vs Claude Code
Amp is built for running many agents at once, and it is the only product here that can bill against a ChatGPT or X subscription you already pay for.
Read comparisonAntigravity vs Cursor
One is free and Gemini-only with an unpublished weekly cap; the other costs $20 and lets you pick your model. That is the whole trade.
Read comparisonAntigravity vs Gemini AI Pro
A common misunderstanding: these are not competing products. Antigravity is the IDE and it is free; Google AI Pro is the subscription that raises its ceiling.
Read comparisonChatGPT Go vs ChatGPT Plus
Go is a chat plan. If you are here to code, the honest answer is that the Codex agent starts at Plus.
Read comparisonChatGPT Go vs ClinePass
Within a dollar of each other, and almost nothing else in common. One answers questions; the other edits your repository.
Read comparisonClaude Max 20x vs Cursor Ultra
Both are the top individual tier at $200. One is a ceiling you cannot cross; the other is a floor you can spend past.
Read comparisonClaude Max 5x vs ChatGPT Pro
Both sell five times their entry tier for $100. Only one of them currently has the 5-hour window switched off.
Read comparisonClaude Max 5x vs Claude Max 20x
Identical models, identical features, identical cap structure. You are buying a multiplier — so the only honest question is how often you hit the current one.
Read comparisonClaude Pro vs ChatGPT Plus
Two $20 seats, two first-party coding agents, and two different answers to the only question that matters — what happens when you hit the wall.
Read comparisonClaude Pro vs ClinePass
The price gap is half the story. The other half is that a Claude subscription is not licensed to drive Cline at all.
Read comparisonClaude Pro vs GitHub Copilot Pro
Half the price, unlimited tab completion, and — since June — Claude Code itself available inside Copilot's credit meter.
Read comparisonClaude Pro vs Cursor Pro
Same price, opposite failure mode: Claude stops and asks you to wait, Cursor keeps going and bills you.
Read comparisonCodex Plus vs Claude Pro
First, the correction: there is no plan called Codex Plus. Codex comes bundled with ChatGPT Plus at $20 — which is exactly what Claude Pro costs.
Read comparisonCopilot Business vs Cursor Teams
The structural difference matters more than the $21: Copilot pools credits across the organisation, Cursor allocates them per seat and lets the rest go unused.
Read comparisonCopilot Pro+ vs Cursor Pro
Copilot works in every IDE you already own; Cursor asks you to move into its editor. That, more than price, is the decision.
Read comparisonCopilot Pro vs Copilot Pro+
Since June, Copilot bills in AI Credits at a cent each. That makes the comparison unusually easy — and shows exactly where Pro+ stops being the right tier.
Read comparisonCursor Pro+ vs Cursor Ultra
Three times versus twenty times, for $60 versus $200. The models are the same — this is entirely an allowance decision.
Read comparisonCursor Pro vs Cursor Pro+
Identical models, identical billing behaviour. You are buying three times the agent limit for three times the price — so it only pays if you are already spending the difference on overage.
Read comparisonCursor Teams Standard vs Premium seat
The answer is almost never 'upgrade everyone'. Seats mix freely, so the real decision is which two or three people need Premium.
Read comparisonDevin vs Claude Code Max
The real difference is concurrency. Devin's upper tiers run unlimited concurrent sessions; every extra Claude Code terminal drains the same weekly pool faster.
Read comparisonDevin vs Cursor
One takes the ticket and opens a pull request. The other sits in your editor and waits for the next instruction. Everything else — price, models, lock-in — follows from that.
Read comparisonFactory vs Claude Code
Factory documents its limits better than anyone in this market — three independent rolling windows, a free fallback pool, and prepaid credits that never expire.
Read comparisonKiro vs Antigravity
Both are big-cloud bets on agent-first IDEs. One charges in countable credits and offers a wide model list; the other is free but Gemini-shaped.
Read comparisonWarp vs Claude Code
Warp replaces your terminal and meters agents in credits; Claude Code is a program you run in whatever terminal you already like.
Read comparisonWindsurf vs Cursor
First, the thing most comparisons still get wrong: Windsurf is now Devin Desktop, on Cognition's pricing ladder, with daily and weekly allowances rather than credits.
Read comparisonModel vs model
Token prices, context windows, output ceilings and where each model can actually be run today.
Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Opus 5
Anthropic's two frontier tiers compared — Fable 5's top-end capability against Opus 5 at half the price.
Read comparisonClaude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Anthropic's and OpenAI's frontier flagships compared across context, price, coding standing, and where you can run them.
Read comparisonClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash
The fast, low-cost tier of each family compared across price, context, multimodal input, coding standing, and speed.
Read comparisonClaude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol
Anthropic's and OpenAI's flagship coding models compared across context, price, coding standing, and where you can run them.
Read comparisonClaude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
The balanced everyday tier of each family compared across price, context, coding standing, and access.
Read comparisonDeepSeek V4 vs Qwen3-Coder-Next
A frontier open-weight family against a compact, self-hostable coding model — parameters, pricing, and benchmarks compared.
Read comparisonGemini 3.1 Pro vs Claude Opus 5
Google's and Anthropic's flagship models compared across price, context, multimodal input, coding standing, and access.
Read comparisonGLM-5.3 vs Claude Sonnet 5
An open-weight coding model against a proprietary frontier Sonnet — weights, pricing, and ecosystem compared.
Read comparisonGLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3
Two Chinese-lab agentic models compared across weights, context, pricing, and coding benchmarks.
Read comparisonGPT-5.6 Luna vs GPT-5.3 Codex
Two OpenAI models with different jobs — a fast, low-cost general tier versus an agentic coding specialist.
Read comparisonGrok 4.6 vs GPT-5.6
xAI's flagship against OpenAI's frontier family, compared across price, context, coding standing, and access.
Read comparisonKimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4
Two Chinese-lab frontier models compared across size, multimodality, weights, pricing, and coding positioning.
Read comparisonMiniMax M3 vs GLM-5.3
A multimodal, computer-use open model against a text-focused coding specialist — weights, pricing, and benchmarks compared.
Read comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 vs Claude Opus 5
Meta's coding model is a quarter of Opus 5's input price and, on Meta's own table, narrowly ahead on coding. Read the data terms before you switch.
Read comparisonQwen3.8-Max vs GLM-5.3
Alibaba's largest 2026 flagship against Z.ai's coding- and agent-tuned model — parameters, pricing, and benchmarks compared.
Read comparisonSWE-2 vs Grok 4.6
On the only table that scores both, SWE-2 leads Grok 4.6 on all four coding rows — by two to seven points. Then Terminal-Bench 4 puts them in the same tier, well behind the long-horizon frontier.
Read comparisonAgent vs agent
Licences, BYOK, parallel sessions and MCP support across the CLI and IDE agents — including the ones that have been discontinued.
Aider vs OpenCode
A Git-native terminal pair programmer, now in maintenance mode, versus an actively developed agentic terminal TUI.
Read comparisonAntigravity CLI vs Gemini CLI
A migration guide: Gemini CLI's free Gemini Code Assist serving ended June 18, 2026, and Antigravity CLI is Google's successor terminal agent.
Read comparisonAugment Code vs Cursor
A context-engine platform that layers onto your editors versus an agent-first editor — compared across price, models, and agents.
Read comparisonClaude Code vs Antigravity
Anthropic's terminal-first coding agent vs Google's agent-first AI coding IDE.
Read comparisonClaude Code vs Cline
Anthropic's proprietary terminal agent versus the open-source, bring-your-own-key agent for VS Code and JetBrains.
Read comparisonClaude Code vs Gemini CLI
Two terminal coding agents compared on pricing, model access, context, workflow, and openness.
Read comparisonClaude Code vs OpenCode
Anthropic's proprietary terminal agent versus the open-source, provider-agnostic terminal agent.
Read comparisonCline vs Kilo Code
Two open-source, bring-your-own-key coding agents from the same lineage, compared on models, modes, and pricing.
Read comparisonCline vs Roo Code
Roo Code was discontinued in May 2026 — here is how it compared to Cline, the upstream project it forked from, and what migrating costs.
Read comparisonCodex CLI vs Antigravity
OpenAI's open-source terminal coding agent vs Google's agent-first AI coding IDE.
Read comparisonCodex CLI vs Claude Code
Two terminal-first AI coding agents compared across models, pricing, workflow, and openness.
Read comparisonCodex CLI vs Gemini CLI
Two open-source terminal coding agents from OpenAI and Google, compared across access, models, workflow, and ecosystem.
Read comparisonCodex CLI vs OpenCode
Two open-source, terminal-first coding agents compared on models, pricing, workflow, and provider independence.
Read comparisonCrush vs OpenCode
Two bring-your-own-key terminal coding agents — a source-available TUI and an MIT-licensed agent — compared across models, extensibility, and automation.
Read comparisonDevin CLI vs Cursor CLI
Both are a vendor's agent without the GUI. One names your sessions and keeps them in a single machine-wide database; the other is an editor's agent that happens to run in a terminal.
Read comparisonDevin vs Factory Droid
Two autonomous coding agents compared across surfaces, model choice, pricing, and extensibility.
Read comparisonGemini CLI vs Antigravity
Google's open-source terminal coding agent vs its agent-first desktop IDE — and what changed after Gemini CLI's June 2026 transition.
Read comparisonGoose vs OpenCode
A general-purpose MCP-native agent versus a coding-focused terminal agent — compared across models, extensions, and automation.
Read comparisonJetBrains Junie vs GitHub Copilot
An IDE-native agent versus the broadest-reaching coding assistant — compared across price, models, and workflow.
Read comparisonJules vs Codex Cloud
Two cloud coding agents that plan, edit, and open pull requests for you — compared across models, limits, and workflow.
Read comparisonMuse Code vs Claude Code
Meta's new terminal agent starts at $5/month and runs subagents in isolated git worktrees. Claude Code costs four times as much and has two years of ecosystem behind it.
Read comparisonMuse Code vs Codex CLI
Both read AGENTS.md, both sandbox by default, both fan out to parallel agents. One of them is open source and one of them is $5 a month.
Read comparisonMuse Code vs Cursor CLI
A standalone agent with a flat plan against an IDE's terminal arm billed out of credit pools. Predictability separates them more than capability does.
Read comparisonMuse Code vs OpenCode
Meta's cheapest-in-class agent, locked to one lab, against an MIT-licensed agent that will run whichever model you point it at.
Read comparisonOpenClaw vs Claude Code
A provider-neutral multi-agent host versus a first-party single-vendor coding agent — compared honestly.
Read comparisonPi vs OpenCode
A minimal, reshapeable agent harness versus a batteries-included terminal agent — compared across design, models, and automation.
Read comparisonRoo Code vs Kilo Code
Roo Code was discontinued in May 2026. Kilo Code is its designated successor — it reads Roo's .roomodes — so this is really a migration guide.
Read comparisonTrae vs Cursor
Two AI-native VS Code forks compared across price, models, agents, and extensibility.
Read comparisonZed vs Cursor
An open-source, Rust-native editor with a built-in agent versus a proprietary AI-first VS Code fork.
Read comparison3- and 4-way matrices
The shortlists people actually compare, side by side in one table.
Claude Code vs Codex CLI vs Antigravity CLI vs OpenCode
Four terminal agents, three of them from big labs and one genuinely independent. Licence and lock-in separate them more than editing quality does.
Read comparisonClaude Code vs Codex vs Antigravity
One from each of the three big labs. They differ less in capability than in what their subscriptions let you do — and one of them is free.
Read comparisonClaude Max 20x vs Codex Pro vs Cursor Ultra
The top individual tier from each vendor, all at $200. Note that 'Codex Pro' isn't a SKU — it's ChatGPT Pro, and its 5-hour window is currently off.
Read comparisonClaude Pro vs ChatGPT Plus vs Cursor Pro
The three seats almost every developer shortlists at $20. The models are all excellent — what actually differs is what happens at the ceiling.
Read comparisonClaude Pro vs ChatGPT Plus vs Cursor Pro vs Copilot Pro
The four seats that cover most of this market. Three cost $20 and one costs $10 — and the meters have almost nothing in common.
Read comparisonCline vs Roo Code vs Kilo Code
Roo Code is discontinued — the repository is archived and there are no more fixes. The real question is which of the two live projects you migrate to.
Read comparisonClinePass vs OpenCode Go vs GLM Coding Plan
The three passes people actually shortlist. They cost almost the same and meter you in three completely different units.
Read comparisonClinePass vs OpenCode Go vs GLM vs Qwen
The four passes worth shortlisting under $20, in one table. They are priced within a few dollars of each other and metered in four incompatible units.
Read comparisonClinePass vs OpenCode Go vs OpenRouter
Two subscriptions with a floor and a ceiling, against a balance with neither. The right answer depends entirely on how spiky your month is.
Read comparisonCursor vs Windsurf vs Copilot
Three AI IDEs, three billing philosophies — on-demand overage, daily and weekly allowances, and a credit meter denominated in cents.
Read comparisonGLM-5.3 vs Kimi K3 vs Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4
The four flagships behind almost every cheap coding pass. Two have genuinely open weights, one has an announcement, and one is unconfirmed.
Read comparisonGLM Coding Lite vs Pro vs Max
Every tier gets the same two models. You are buying credits, and only credits — so the only question is how many you actually burn.
Read comparisonGLM vs Kimi vs Qwen
The three big lab-direct coding subscriptions. One publishes exact credits, one gates its best context behind the top tier, and one paused sign-ups entirely.
Read comparisonGLM vs MiniMax vs DeepSeek
Three business models for roughly the same class of model: a credit subscription, a multimodal quota, and no subscription at all.
Read comparisonMuse Code vs Claude Code vs Codex CLI vs Cursor CLI
Four terminal agents from four labs. Meta arrived last and undercut everyone — here is what the $5 plan actually gives up.
Read comparisonOpenRouter vs OpenCode Zen vs DevPass vs Nano-GPT
Four aggregators, four business models: a purchase fee, a curated catalogue, a 3x flat-rate multiplier, and no deposit fee at all.
Read comparisonOpus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
The three Western flagships. All three claim a million-token context — and all three charge you differently for actually using it.
Read comparison